#include "standard_lateness_apology.h"
As usual, I’ve accumulated a backlog of articles and stuff while sitting
on some references for an essay I may never write. It’s an eclectic bunch,
so rather than try to find some sort of theme to tie them together, I’ll just
jump right in.
#
Look, Ma! Official Recognition! Mark Engelbert directs
us to an article describing
new words in the
OED,
including everyone’s favorite annoyed grunt, “D’oh!” (that’s the spelling Matt
Groening prefers, although the article spells it “Doh!” and others prefer “Dowh!”).
Other new entries include the phrase “planet Zog”, which is apparently
from Bridget Jones’s Diary. I must say this puzzles me: It takes
twelve years for “D’oh!” to get in, but “planet Zog” makes it after a single
book-and-movie?
#
Humans: Less intelligent than one might think
Two examples
of how people can easily be led to assert false information. The first is an
experiment testing brand loyalty performed
by a group of ninth graders. They performed some simple tests like having people
wear Nike or Reebox sneakers blindfolded while informing them that they are
wearing the opposite brand, and then asking which the subject preferred. A
surprising number chose the shoe they thought matched the brand they preferred,
rather than the actual shoe from the brand they preferred.
Elsewhere, a group tested how easy it is to
create false
vacation memories. After asking people about a trip to Disneyland while in the
presence of a cardboard cutout of Bugs Bunny, an ad describing a visit with
Bugs Bunny at Disneyland, or both, they found that about a third of
the participants claimed to remember meeting Bugs Bunny at the amusement
park—despite the fact that Disney and Warner Brothers are blood enemies. (via
WebWord and
Swaine)
#
The Internet > The Web > The Dot-Coms
Now that the
mind-bogglingly over-hyped dot-com gold rush has ended in the inevitable crash,
some are saying that the internet has failed to deliver on its promises.
Uh, no. What the internet failed to do was allow companies with no apparent
business model avoid going out of business after running out of money
(cf. Doc Searls’s
comparison to The Producers), and no
one ever claimed it would do that anyway. Zeldman says it well in an article
dealing with the setbacks for web designers
caused by the sudden imposition of reality:
Lost in all the hand-wringing over this temporary (there, we said it)
market readjustment is the medium's unchanged essence. The Web is
people—always was, always will be. The Web gives everyone from the isolated
single mother to the small company to the self-publisher the means to
connect and communicate. That hasn't changed.
(Unfortunately, the only address for this article is one that points to the
current article in the column; I can’t find one for the specific
article. Looks like someone hasn’t quite grasped the
permanent reference concept yet.)
#
More consumer appliance idiocy
I mentioned ReplayTV replacing “pause” with
“display ad” and the questions this raises about appliances that change
their capabilities after you buy them, so it’s only fair to look at Tivo’s
recent upgrade, which some allege makes using
the hardware inconvenient without subscribing to Tivo. Apparently, there
were some features that could be used without a subscription, but now all sorts
of irritations pop up unless the box’s owner subscribes.
I can understand how people would be annoyed by this, but I can’t really
get upset at Tivo. The box is designed to be used by subscribers; everyone else
is in a sort of gray zone. So far as I can tell, things haven’t gotten worse
for paying customers. And besides, you can pay a little more for the lifetime
subscription and end up paying… about as much as you would for a ReplayTV, which
also has no subscription fee. Hmm…. (via a
Slashdot thread via
Swaine)
#