< What If? | Russ Allbery > Reviews | Deep Work > |

Publisher: | Princeton University |

Copyright: | 1998, 2007 |

Printing: | 2010 |

ISBN: | 0-691-14600-4 |

Format: | Trade paperback |

Pages: | 259 |

Subtitled The Story of √-1, An Imaginary Tale is a history
of the use of the number mathematicians normally call *i*. Nahin
starts in the 15th century with the discussion of the time on solving
cubic equations, specifically del Ferro's solution to the depressed cubic.
He walks through how to approach that solution with imaginary numbers,
provides a brief introduction to the complex number plane, and then
explains that del Ferro didn't follow the logic in those directions at
all. Mathematicians at the time were dubious about negative numbers
because they were not intuitive representations of real-world quantities.
The square root of negative numbers was considered simply impossible.

Nahin continues on in this historical vein for three chapters, walking through the mathematical problems that arose from analysis of cubics and the constant appearance of imaginary numbers, the early attempts to find a geometric interpretation, and then the slow development of the modern conception of imaginary numbers in the 19th century. The emphasis throughout is on the specifics of the math, not on the personalities, although there are a few personal tidbits. Along the way, he takes frequent side journeys to highlight the various places complex numbers are useful in solving otherwise-intractable problems.

After that initial history come two chapters of applications of complex
numbers: vector analysis, Kepler's laws, applications in electrical
engineering, and more. He does win a special place in my heart by walking
through the vector analysis problem that George Gamow uses to demonstrate
complex numbers in One Two
Three... Infinity: a treasure map whose directions depend on landmarks
that no longer exist. Following that is a great chapter on deeper
mathematical wizardry involving *i*, including Euler's identity,
*i ^{i}*, and a pretty good explanation of hyperbolic functions.
The final chapter is an introduction to complex function theory.

One's opinion of this book is going to vary a lot depending on what type of history of math you like to read. Unfortunately, it wasn't what I was hoping for. That doesn't make it a bad book — other reviewers have recommended it highly, and I think it would be a great book for someone with slightly different interests. But it's a very mathematical book. It's full of proofs, calculations, and analysis, and assumes that you remember a reasonable amount of algebra and calculus to follow along. It's been a long time since I studied math, and while I probably could have traced the links between steps of his proofs and derivations with some effort, I found myself skimming through large chunks of this book.

I love histories of mathematics, and even popularizations of bits of it (particularly number theory), but with the emphasis on the popularization. If you're like me and are expecting something more like The Music of the Primes, or even One Two Three... Infinity, be warned that this is less about the people or the concepts and more about the math itself. If you've read books like that and thought they needed more equations, more detail, and more of the actual calculations, this may be exactly what you're looking for.

Nahin is fun to read, at least when I wasn't getting lost in steps that are obvious to him. He's quite enthusiastic about the topic and clearly loves being able to show how to take apart a difficult mathematical equation using a novel technique. His joy reminds me of when I was most enjoying my techniques of integration class in college. Even when I started skimming past the details, I liked his excitement.

This wasn't what I was looking for, so I can't exactly recommend it, but hopefully this review will help you guess whether you would like it. It's much heavier on the mathematics and lighter on the popularization, and if that's the direction you would have preferred the other similar books I've reviewed to go, this may be worth your attention.

Reviewed: 2015-01-01

< What If? | Russ Allbery > Reviews | Deep Work > |